Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2017-02-21 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro is a bit better than the HTC U Ultra, with a general score of 77.2 against 77. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro is a newer cellphone than the HTC U Ultra, although it's just a little heavier and just a bit thicker. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a bit faster processing unit than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a screen that's just as good as HTC U Ultra's display, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a just a little inferior count of pixels per inch of screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger screen. HTC U Ultra features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the HTC U Ultra also has a lot higher (4K) video definition, a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos and a bigger sensor taking better quality photos and videos.
HTC U Ultra counts with a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the HTC U Ultra also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has superior battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.