Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | ZTE |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Ochre and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, getting a general score of 77 against 76.6. HTC U Ultra is a just a bit lighter phone than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, but they are equally thin. HTC U Ultra counts with just a bit better looking screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better screen pixel density.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro features slightly more memory for applications and games than HTC U Ultra, because although it has an external memory slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a bit superior processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger number of faster cores and 2 GB more RAM.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has improved battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. ZTE Axon 10s Pro's camera is very similar to HTC U Ultra's camera, and although the ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a larger camera sensor taking higher quality photos, a camera with much more mega-pixels and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos, they both have the same 2560x1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video quality and the same video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.