Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| Android, HTC Sense UI | -- |
| 2018-01-17 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is much better than the HTC U11 EYEs, having a general score of 88.1 against 76.9. IPhone X's design is just a bit thinner and a little lighter than HTC U11 EYEs, although they were only released 3 months apart. IPhone X counts with a better performing processor than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and 2 less CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone X has a better looking display than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a just a bit better number of pixels in each inch of screen. The HTC U11 EYEs features a greater storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone X, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Apple iPhone X features a little bit better camera than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same resolution camera in the back and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Apple iPhone X also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate. HTC U11 EYEs counts with a way better battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 45 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.