Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| Android, HTC Sense UI | -- |
| 2018-01-17 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is a little bit better than the HTC U11 EYEs, with an 84.2 score against 76.9. The Apple iPhone XS design is a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the HTC U11 EYEs, although both of them were released only a couple of months apart. IPhone XS counts with a better screen than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a little bit higher pixel quantity per inch of screen.
HTC U11 EYEs features a much better storage for games and applications than iPhone XS, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the HTC U11 EYEs also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Apple iPhone XS has a greater processing power than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores (although faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The HTC U11 EYEs counts with a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 3930mAh battery size instead of 2659mAh. The Apple iPhone XS features just a bit better camera than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition and a camera with a 12 mega pixels, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.