Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android, HTC Sense UI | Android 14 |
| 2018-01-17 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is slightly better than HTC U11 EYEs, getting a score of 81.9 against 76.9. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a way newer cellphone, and it is also just a little bit thinner and a little lighter than HTC U11 EYEs. Motorola Edge 50 Neo comes with Android 14 OS, while HTC U11 EYEs works with Android, HTC Sense UI OS.
HTC U11 EYEs has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much more vibrant display than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a better 1256 x 2760 resolution, a little bit greater screen pixels density and a little bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a way better camera than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a much better 50 MP resolution camera.
The HTC U11 EYEs has a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a bit better battery performance than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a 10 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.