Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android, HTC Sense UI | Android 14 |
| 2018-01-17 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than HTC U11 EYEs, having a overall score of 87.1 against 76.9. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is way newer, but just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than the HTC U11 EYEs. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 operating system, while HTC U11 EYEs comes with Android, HTC Sense UI operating system.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better looking display than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a little bit worse pixel number in each inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit larger screen. The HTC U11 EYEs features a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots greater videos and photos than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more storage capacity for apps and games than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit better battery performance than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.