Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android, HTC Sense UI | -- |
| 2018-01-17 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | -- |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is better than HTC U11 EYEs, getting a 90.7 score against 76.9. The Galaxy A52 design has the same thickness than HTC U11 EYEs, but it's a little bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a slightly better display than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a little bit better pixels count per screen inch, a little bit larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a little bit better performance than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 features a bit bigger storage for games and applications than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A52 counts with just a little better battery performance than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3930mAh. The Galaxy A52 shoots a lot better videos and photos than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.