Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android, HTC Sense UI | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-01-17 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | -- |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the HTC U11 EYEs, with a score of 91.3 against 76.9. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a just a bit heavier cellphone than the HTC U11 EYEs, but they have the same thickness. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G comes with Android 12 OS, while HTC U11 EYEs comes with Android, HTC Sense UI OS.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a little faster processor than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better looking screen than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of display, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit larger screen.
Galaxy A52 5G has slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy A52 5G has a little longer battery duration than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3930mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a lot better camera than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking pictures or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.