Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android, HTC Sense UI | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-01-17 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Metal | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is just a bit better than the HTC U11 EYEs, having a 79.3 score against 76.9. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 works with Android 5.1 operating system, and HTC U11 EYEs counts with Android, HTC Sense UI operating system. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 body is just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner than HTC U11 EYEs, even though it was released many years before.
The HTC U11 EYEs has just a bit better performance than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the HTC U11 EYEs also has 7 more cores. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a better looking screen than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
HTC U11 EYEs has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the HTC U11 EYEs also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note 5 takes just a bit better photos and videos than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light photos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy Note 5 also counts with a camera with much more mega-pixels.
HTC U11 EYEs features superior battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 3930mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.