Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android, HTC Sense UI | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-01-17 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD 3 | -- |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than the HTC U11 EYEs's 76.9 general score. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a notably newer device than HTC U11 EYEs, although it is much thicker and a lot heavier. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo OS, while HTC U11 EYEs has Android, HTC Sense UI OS.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a brighter screen than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch in the display. HTC U11 EYEs has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the HTC U11 EYEs also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a little better processing power than HTC U11 EYEs. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better battery lifetime than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3930mAh. The HTC U11 EYEs counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking photos or videos in low-light situations, and they both have a camera in the back with a 12 mega-pixels, the HTC U11 EYEs also counts with a lot better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.