Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android, HTC Sense UI | Android 10 |
| 2018-01-17 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Blasting black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a general score of 90.1, which is much better than HTC U11 EYEs's 76.9 general score. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro body is notably newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than HTC U11 EYEs. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro works with Android 10 OS, while HTC U11 EYEs works with Android, HTC Sense UI OS.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit faster processor than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a little sharper display than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a bigger screen, a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and a little better pixel quantity in each inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro captures much better videos and photos than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photographs or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The HTC U11 EYEs has more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features longer battery performance than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a 27% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.