Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android, HTC Sense UI | Android 12 |
| 2018-01-17 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.32 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.97 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a general score of 91.5, which is much better than HTC U11 EYEs's 76.9 overall score. Even though the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is a lot newer than the HTC U11 EYEs, it's a bit thicker and heavier. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has Android 12 OS, while HTC U11 EYEs counts with Android, HTC Sense UI OS.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with just a little better processing power than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has 4 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a bit more vivid screen than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a bit inferior pixel count per display inch, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
HTC U11 EYEs counts with more memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer takes way better pictures and videos than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a camera with a much higher 200 mega pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a bit superior battery duration than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a 4300mAh battery size instead of 3930mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.