Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android, HTC Sense UI | Android 10 |
| 2018-01-17 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 EYEs is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, with a global score of 76.9 against 76.6. HTC U11 EYEs is an a lot older phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but HTC made it just a bit thinner and a little lighter. The HTC U11 EYEs comes with Android, HTC Sense UI OS, and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 works with Android 10 OS.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a little better performance than HTC U11 EYEs, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a screen that is just as good as the screen in HTC U11 EYEs, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit bigger display.
The HTC U11 EYEs counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the HTC U11 EYEs also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 shoots much better pictures and videos than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has improved battery performance than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.