Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android, HTC Sense UI | Android 10 |
| 2018-01-17 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a little bit better than the HTC U11 EYEs, getting a general score of 81.1 against 76.9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro works with Android 10 operating system, and HTC U11 EYEs comes with Android, HTC Sense UI operating system. Even though the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is newer than the HTC U11 EYEs, it's heavier and just a little thicker.
HTC U11 EYEs and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro feature really similar displays, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. HTC U11 EYEs features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the HTC U11 EYEs also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a little better processing power than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with better battery lifetime than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a 28 percent bigger battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes greater photographs and videos than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.