Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2017-11-02 | 2020-04-24 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Red and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone SE (2020) has a score of 81.5, which is a little bit better than the HTC U11 life's global score of 74.5. Even though Apple iPhone SE (2020) is just a little heavier than the HTC U11 life, it's just a little thinner and also newer. Apple iPhone SE (2020) and HTC U11 life feature very similar displays, although the Apple iPhone SE (2020) has a bit inferior number of pixels per screen inch, a bit smaller display and a way worse resolution of 750 x 1334 pixels.
The HTC U11 life features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) counts with a superior hardware performance than HTC U11 life, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone SE (2020) also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Apple iPhone SE (2020) shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than HTC U11 life, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot worse 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
HTC U11 life features a much longer battery life than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 2600mAh battery capacity.
Apple iPhone SE (2020) costs a little more than HTC U11 life, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.