Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| 2017-11-02 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is slightly better than the HTC U11 life's score of 74.5. The iPhone XR body is newer than the HTC U11 life's, but it's way heavier and a little thicker. The Apple iPhone XR features a better hardware performance than HTC U11 life, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone XR also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone XR counts with a screen that's very similar to HTC U11 life's display, because although the Apple iPhone XR has a little lower pixels density and a quite lower resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels, it also counts with a larger screen. The Apple iPhone XR has just a bit better camera than HTC U11 life, because although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a lot less mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture.
HTC U11 life counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than iPhone XR, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. IPhone XR features a bit superior battery life than HTC U11 life, because it has a 2942mAh battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is way more expensive than the HTC U11 life, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the HTC U11 life. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone XR, but if you don't you can save some money and get the HTC U11 life, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.