Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-11-02 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is much better than HTC U11 life, having an 82.5 score against 74.5. Although the LG V30S ThinQ and HTC U11 life were only released 4 months apart, the LG V30S ThinQ body is a little bit thinner but heavier than HTC U11 life. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit faster processing unit than HTC U11 life, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than HTC U11 life, because it has a larger screen, a better screen density and a much better 1440 x 2880 resolution. The LG V30S ThinQ features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than HTC U11 life, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
LG V30S ThinQ features improved battery performance than HTC U11 life, because it has a 27% more battery capacity. The LG V30S ThinQ shoots just a bit better videos and photos than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same video resolution and a back-facing camera with a 16 mega pixels resolution, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a larger diafragm aperture for better low light images.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HTC U11 life, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC U11 life. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the LG V30S ThinQ, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the HTC U11 life, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.