Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than HTC U11 life, with an 81.2 score against 74.5. LG V40 ThinQ's body is newer and a little bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the HTC U11 life. The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit superior processor than HTC U11 life, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better screen than HTC U11 life, because it has a better pixel density, a larger screen and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. LG V40 ThinQ features a better memory for games and applications than HTC U11 life, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 64 GB internal memory.
LG V40 ThinQ shoots clearer photographs and videos than HTC U11 life, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way worse 12 megapixels resolution and a worse video quality, it also counts with a much bigger diafragm aperture. LG V40 ThinQ has improved battery duration than HTC U11 life, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
LG V40 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.