Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-02 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is much better than HTC U11 life, getting an 89.6 score against 74.5. The Motorola edge design is a lot newer, but way heavier and somewhat thicker than the HTC U11 life. Motorola edge features a bit better CPU than HTC U11 life, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola edge also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
HTC U11 life features a little sharper screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel count in each screen inch. The Motorola edge counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than HTC U11 life, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Motorola edge has a superior battery duration than HTC U11 life, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Motorola edge has a much better camera than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola edge also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos in low-light environments and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Motorola edge is a lot more expensive than the HTC U11 life, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.