Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-11-02 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blue | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is much better than the HTC U11 life's 74.5 overall score. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is notably newer, but just a bit thicker and noticeably heavier than the HTC U11 life. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a sharper screen than HTC U11 life, because although it has a little inferior pixel quantity per display inch, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bigger screen.
The HTC U11 life has a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC U11 life, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a superior battery lifetime than HTC U11 life, because it has a 73% more battery size. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot better camera than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a lot more MP back facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.