Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-02 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| S-LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is better than the HTC U11 life's global score of 74.5. The Motorola razr (2020) design is notably newer and a little bit thinner, but also a lot heavier than HTC U11 life. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit better processing power than HTC U11 life, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
HTC U11 life features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 1920px. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than HTC U11 life, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit superior battery performance than HTC U11 life, because it has 2800mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh. Motorola razr (2020) shoots better photographs and videos than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in low light situations and a way more mega pixels camera.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the HTC U11 life, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as HTC U11 life. If you want to save some dollars, you can get HTC U11 life, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.