Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-02 | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 has a general score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the HTC U11 life's overall score of 74.5. The Galaxy A31 body is notably newer, but noticeably heavier and just a little thicker than HTC U11 life. The HTC U11 life has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixels quantity in each inch in the display.
HTC U11 life has just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A31, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The HTC U11 life has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A31, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A31 counts with a really longer battery life than HTC U11 life, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy A31 counts with a better camera than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same aperture, the Galaxy A31 also has a much better 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.