Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-11-02 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is much better than HTC U11 life's 74.5 general score. The Galaxy A50 body is newer and just a little thinner than HTC U11 life's, but it is also somewhat heavier. Galaxy A50 has a bit better performance than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50 also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
HTC U11 life features a bit better display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little better display pixels density. The Galaxy A50 has a slightly better camera than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A50 also has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a bigger aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for apps and games than HTC U11 life, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A50 has a much longer battery life than HTC U11 life, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Galaxy A50 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.