Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-11-02 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is better than HTC U11 life, getting a general score of 86.6 against 74.5. Samsung Galaxy A50s is a newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than HTC U11 life, but it is also somewhat heavier. HTC U11 life has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater screen density.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with just a bit better processing power than HTC U11 life, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A50s counts with a better camera than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same (4K) video quality and the same aperture, the Galaxy A50s also has a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a better storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC U11 life, because although it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a superior battery duration than HTC U11 life, because it has a 54% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.