Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-02 | 2019-12-27 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is better than HTC U11 life, getting an 85.5 score against 74.5. The Galaxy A51 is a incredibly newer and a little bit thinner phone than the HTC U11 life, although it's somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with just a little better hardware performance than HTC U11 life, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The HTC U11 life has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A51 has a superior camera than HTC U11 life, and although they both have a F2 diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a camera with way more MP.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11 life, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a superior battery duration than HTC U11 life, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy A51 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.