Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-11-02 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is a lot better than the HTC U11 life's global score of 74.5. Although the Samsung Galaxy A52 is noticeably newer than HTC U11 life, it's a lot heavier and a bit thicker. Galaxy A52 has a bit better performance than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The HTC U11 life features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a little higher amount of pixels in each inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots greater photographs and videos than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a lot more mega pixels camera and a larger camera aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than HTC U11 life, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A52 has a much longer battery duration than HTC U11 life, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.