Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-11-02 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is way better than the HTC U11 life, getting a 91.3 score against 74.5. Galaxy A52 5G's body is notably newer than the HTC U11 life's, although it's a lot heavier and just a bit thicker. The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better hardware performance than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
HTC U11 life features a bit better screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy A52 5G has a much better memory capacity for apps and games than HTC U11 life, because although it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a greater camera than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger camera aperture and a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a way better battery lifetime than HTC U11 life, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.