Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-11-02 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is a little bit better than the HTC U11 life, having a general score of 76.9 against 74.5. Galaxy A70's design is newer and a bit thinner, but way heavier than the HTC U11 life. Galaxy A70 counts with a processor that's very similar to HTC U11 life's CPU, and although the Galaxy A70 has 3 GB more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The HTC U11 life has a slightly better display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display. The HTC U11 life has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and videos, they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates.
The Galaxy A70 features more storage for applications and games than HTC U11 life, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A70 counts with a much longer battery life than HTC U11 life, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy A70 is also the cheapest one, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.