Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-02 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is much better than the HTC U11 life, having a general score of 87.5 against 74.5. Although Samsung Galaxy A71 is noticeably heavier than the HTC U11 life, it's just a little thinner and extremely newer. Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with just a little better performance than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has more RAM memory.
The HTC U11 life has a bit better screen than Galaxy A71, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels number per screen inch. The Galaxy A71 features a way better camera than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 also has a larger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in low light environments and a way better resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a bigger storage for games and applications than HTC U11 life, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A71 has a much longer battery performance than HTC U11 life, because it has a 73% bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 costs more money than the HTC U11 life, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.