Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2017-11-02 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 is slightly better than the HTC U11 life, with a general score of 78.9 against 74.5. Even though Galaxy M20 is newer than the HTC U11 life, it is a lot heavier and just a bit thicker. HTC U11 life has a little bit better display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a just a little higher display density.
HTC U11 life counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy M20, although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The HTC U11 life features a bit more memory for games and applications than Galaxy M20, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy M20 counts with a much longer battery duration than HTC U11 life, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2600mAh. The HTC U11 life counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs and videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a higher 16 mega pixels resolution and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.