Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-11-02 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is a lot better than the HTC U11 life, having a general score of 90.8 against 74.5. The Galaxy Note 20 is a incredibly newer phone than HTC U11 life, although it's just a bit thicker and extremely heavier. The HTC U11 life has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a way smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit more powerful processor than HTC U11 life, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM memory. The HTC U11 life counts with a much bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a much better camera than HTC U11 life, because although it has a back camera with much less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much better video quality and a bigger aperture for better images and video in poorly lited situations. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a very superior battery duration than HTC U11 life, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 costs a lot more than HTC U11 life, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.