Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2017-11-02 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than HTC U11 life, getting a overall score of 81.2 against 74.5. Even being the best in this comparison, the Galaxy Note 3 is a incredibly older, just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than the HTC U11 life. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a little more vivid display than HTC U11 life, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a little larger display.
Galaxy Note 3 has a bit superior processing unit than HTC U11 life, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a GPU. The Galaxy Note 3 and HTC U11 life have extremely similar cameras, although the Galaxy Note 3 has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photos or video in poorly lited environments and a camera with a worse 13 megapixels resolution.
HTC U11 life counts with a much better memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note 3 has superior battery life than HTC U11 life, because it has a 3200mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.