Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-02 | 2020-01-21 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite is much better than the HTC U11 life, with a global score of 86.2 against 74.5. Galaxy Note10 Lite's body is a lot newer, but way heavier and a little bit thicker than HTC U11 life. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit faster processor than HTC U11 life, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has more RAM.
The HTC U11 life counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a much smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels count per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit better camera than HTC U11 life, because although it has a lower video quality and a back camera with lot less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U11 life, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a superior battery lifetime than HTC U11 life, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.