Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-11-02 | -- |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.01 ounces | -- |
| Blue | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is better than the HTC U11 life, having a score of 82.6 against 74.5. Galaxy S25's body is extremely thinner and lighter than HTC U11 life. Galaxy S25 has a sharper screen than HTC U11 life, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
HTC U11 life has a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The HTC U11 life has a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a much longer battery performance than HTC U11 life, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Galaxy S25 captures way better photographs and videos than HTC U11 life, because it has a way better video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and video and a much higher resolution camera.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the HTC U11 life, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC U11 life. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy S25, else you can save some money and get the HTC U11 life, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.