Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-11-02 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Blue | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD | -- |
| 424 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than HTC U11 life's overall score of 74.5. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro construction is noticeably newer than HTC U11 life's, although it's extremely thicker and way heavier. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better CPU than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little more vivid screen than HTC U11 life, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per inch in the screen. The HTC U11 life has a little bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
HTC U11 life shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier aperture, it also counts with a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than HTC U11 life, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than HTC U11 life, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC U11 life. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy XCover FieldPro, else you can save some dollars and get the HTC U11 life, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.