Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-02 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| S-LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is a lot better than the HTC U11 life's 74.5 global score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is notably newer and thinner, but also noticeably heavier than HTC U11 life. The HTC U11 life has a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixels number in each screen inch.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly better memory for games and applications than HTC U11 life, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better processor than HTC U11 life, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better battery duration than HTC U11 life, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than HTC U11 life, because although it has a back-facing camera with way less mega-pixels and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than HTC U11 life, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC U11 life. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the HTC U11 life, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.