Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-02 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Blue | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco M3 is a little bit better than HTC U11 life, getting a score of 78.2 against 74.5. The Xiaomi Poco M3 body is incredibly newer, but somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier than HTC U11 life. The HTC U11 life has just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a little better display pixels density.
The HTC U11 life counts with a slightly better memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. HTC U11 life counts with a bit better processor than Xiaomi Poco M3, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a much better camera than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a larger aperture for better captures in poorly lited environments and a back facing camera with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features a way better battery performance than HTC U11 life, because it has a 131 percent bigger battery size.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.