Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-02 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is slightly better than HTC U11 life, with a general score of 81.1 against 74.5. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's design is noticeably newer than HTC U11 life's, although it's noticeably heavier and a little thicker. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The HTC U11 life counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher quantity of pixels in each display inch. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a way better camera than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a larger aperture to take better low-light images and video and a way higher resolution camera.
HTC U11 life features a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much longer battery life than HTC U11 life, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.