Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2017-05-18 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max is better than HTC U11, getting an 85.3 score against 77.6. IPhone 11 Pro Max's design is notably newer than HTC U11's, although it is heavier and just a little thicker. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a little bit better looking display than HTC U11, because although it has a little lower number of pixels per inch of display and a bit lower 1242 x 2688 resolution, it also counts with a bigger display.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a superior CPU than HTC U11, because although it has 2 less cpu cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same resolution back facing camera and the same camera sensor size, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate.
The HTC U11 counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the HTC U11 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 128 GB. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has improved battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 32% more battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as HTC U11. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the HTC U11, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.