Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2017-05-18 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro is better than the HTC U11, having a overall score of 92.8 against 77.6. IPhone 12 Pro's construction is a lot newer and a bit thinner than the HTC U11's, but it is somewhat heavier. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a little sharper screen than HTC U11, because although it has a just a little lower pixels amount in each inch of display and a little worse 1170 x 2532 resolution, it also counts with a little larger display.
The iPhone 12 Pro counts with a superior processing unit than HTC U11, because although it has less CPU cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and 2 GB more RAM memory. The iPhone 12 Pro has just a bit more memory for games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro captures clearer videos and photos than HTC U11, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same resolution back-facing camera, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro also has a larger camera aperture and faster video frame rate. HTC U11 counts with a little longer battery life than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC U11. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone 12 Pro, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the HTC U11, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.