Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2017-05-18 | 2020-04-24 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Black, Red and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone SE (2020) is a bit better than the HTC U11, with a global score of 81.5 against 77.6. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) is a noticeably newer cellphone, and it's also just a bit thinner and lighter than the HTC U11. Apple iPhone SE (2020) features a greater performance than HTC U11, because although it has 2 less cpu cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The HTC U11 features a little more vivid screen than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a bigger display, a much higher number of pixels per inch in the screen and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The HTC U11 features much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone SE (2020), and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the HTC U11 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB.
HTC U11 has a way better battery duration than iPhone SE (2020), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) shoots a little bit better videos and photos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting images or video in poorly lited situations and a tinier sensor, and they both have the same video resolution and a camera in the back with a 12 mega pixels resolution, the Apple iPhone SE (2020) also counts with faster video frame rate.
Although Apple iPhone SE (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC U11. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone SE (2020), else you can save some dollars and buy the HTC U11, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.