Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| 2017-05-18 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is better than HTC U11's 77.6 general score. IPhone X's design is a little bit thinner but a little bit heavier than the HTC U11, and both were released with only a couple months difference. Apple iPhone X counts with a little sharper screen than HTC U11, because although it has a little worse number of pixels per inch in the display and a little worse resolution of 1125 x 2436px, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
IPhone X features a bit better hardware performance than HTC U11, because although it has less and slower cores and 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. IPhone X has much more storage to store more apps and games than HTC U11, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The HTC U11 has a bit longer battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 3000mAh battery size against 2716mAh. The Apple iPhone X shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller aperture and a smaller camera sensor, and they both have the same video quality and the same resolution back camera, the Apple iPhone X also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as HTC U11. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone X, otherwise you can save some money and get the HTC U11, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.