Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| 2017-05-18 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has an overall score of 82, which is a little bit better than the HTC U11's score of 77.6. The iPhone XR body is newer, but somewhat heavier and a bit thicker than HTC U11. HTC U11 counts with a bit sharper display than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a much greater number of pixels per inch of display.
The HTC U11 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone XR, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the HTC U11 also has an external memory slot that holds up to 128 GB. The Apple iPhone XR features a bit better hardware performance than HTC U11, because although it has 2 less CPU cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The HTC U11 and the Apple iPhone XR count with really similar batteries, although the Apple iPhone XR has a 2 percent lower battery capacity. Apple iPhone XR captures clearer photographs and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same back camera sensor size, the Apple iPhone XR also counts with faster video frame rates.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC U11. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the iPhone XR, otherwise you can save some money and get the HTC U11, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.