Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Titan gray |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is much better than the HTC U11, with an 85.4 score against 77.6. LG K92's body is extremely newer than HTC U11's, but it is just a little thicker and heavier. HTC U11 has a bit more powerful processing unit than LG K92, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
HTC U11 counts with a bit sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixel count per inch in the display. LG K92 has a much greater storage to install applications and games than HTC U11, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG K92 captures much clearer photographs and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and video in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the LG K92 also counts with a way larger sensor capturing much better quality photos and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
The LG K92 has longer battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
LG K92 costs a lot more money than the HTC U11, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.