Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Mirror black |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG Q70 is a bit better than the HTC U11, having a global score of 77.9 against 77.6. LG Q70 is a much newer phone than HTC U11, but it's heavier and just a little thicker. HTC U11 features a little better performance than LG Q70. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores. The HTC U11 features a little sharper screen than LG Q70, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch in the screen.
LG Q70 counts with just a bit better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier sensor and a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the LG Q70 also counts with a much better 32 megapixels resolution camera.
LG Q70 counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than HTC U11, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Q70 also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Q70 features superior battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although LG Q70 is a better device, it costs more money than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC U11. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy LG Q70, otherwise you can save some money and buy the HTC U11, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.