Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Holographic white |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC U11 has a score of 77.6, which is a bit better than LG Stylo 6's 76.7 global score. HTC U11 is an much older phone than LG Stylo 6, but HTC was able to make it much lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. HTC U11 counts with a little sharper display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen density and a bit higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The LG Stylo 6 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than HTC U11, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Stylo 6 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. HTC U11 features a little bit better processing power than LG Stylo 6. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The LG Stylo 6 features improved battery life than HTC U11, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The HTC U11 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a less MP camera in the back, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution, a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos and a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low light situations.
Although HTC U11 is a better device, it is more expensive than LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG Stylo 6. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy HTC U11, else you can save some money and get the LG Stylo 6, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.