Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-05-18 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is slightly better than HTC U11's 77.6 score. The LG V30S ThinQ construction is newer, a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the HTC U11. The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit more powerful processing unit than HTC U11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The HTC U11 and the LG V30S ThinQ both feature quite similar displays, although the LG V30S ThinQ also has a just a little higher display density, a little larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. LG V30S ThinQ has a camera that's very similar to the HTC U11 one, because although the LG V30S ThinQ has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, it also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
LG V30S ThinQ has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U11, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. LG V30S ThinQ has a little longer battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 10 percent bigger battery size.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC U11. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy HTC U11, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.