Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| 2017-05-18 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Black and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the HTC U11's global score of 77.6. LG V35 ThinQ is a newer cellphone, and it's also a little thinner and a little lighter than the HTC U11. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better looking screen than HTC U11, because it has a little better pixels quantity per display inch, a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a little bigger screen.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better hardware performance than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and videos.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with much more memory to store more apps and games than HTC U11, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ features just a little better battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 10% greater battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the LG V35 ThinQ is also cheaper than the HTC U11.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.