Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| 2017-05-18 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is better than HTC U11's score of 77.6. LG Velvet is a just a little heavier phone than HTC U11, but both are equally thin. LG Velvet's CPU is just as good as HTC U11's processing unit, and although the LG Velvet has a larger amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The HTC U11 features a slightly better screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels number per inch in the screen and a little higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. LG Velvet shoots better photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the LG Velvet also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
LG Velvet counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than HTC U11, because it has more internal memory and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet features a much better battery duration than HTC U11, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The LG Velvet not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.