Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro is much better than the HTC U11, getting a general score of 92.8 against 77.6. Motorola Edge 20 Pro's construction has the same thickness than the HTC U11, but it is heavier. HTC U11 features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better pixel density.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has just a little better processing power than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a very superior battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size. Motorola Edge 20 Pro takes greater photographs and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.